Evidence and Effectiveness in Decisionmaking for Quarantine

American Journal of Public Health
American Public Health Association
Evidence and Effectiveness in Decisionmaking for Quarantine

Cécile M. Bensimon, PhD, MA and Ross E.G. Upshur, MD, MA, MSc, FRCPC

Additional article information

Abstract

When public health decisionmakers turned to quarantine during the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic, difficult questions were raised about the legitimacy and acceptability of restrictive measures to attain public health goals. SARS also brought to light how scientific uncertainty can permeate public health decisionmaking, leading us to think about the relationship between the adequacy of evidence of the effectiveness of an intervention and its role in the justification of public health action.

In this article, we critically examine the role of evidence and effectiveness in decision-making for quarantine. It is our contention that the effectiveness of a public health intervention should not be defined exclusively in (absolute and objective) scientific terms but rather conceptualized relationally and normatively in public health decisionmaking.
— Read on www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854977/

Read this article from year 2007 (SARS) of American Journal of Public Health☝🏻


Discover more useful new here


We inform you about Health | Fashion | Travel | Golf | International Business

Kind regards

M.Sc.Econ. Lassi Pensikkala

Founder of Amer Experience

Studied Economy, Psychology and Sociology at the University of Hamburg Germany. I speak English, Spanish, German, Swedish and Finnish

AmerExperience.com | Created at The Pacific Coast of Americas

[ Microblogs – Short but powerful ]

AmerExperience.com